Thank You for this and previous article on ML, M. Klaus. You're very funny. I don't mean to offend, and dunno this of interest. I found a couple typos:
1) "we predict it to not happen and it doesn’t, we predict it not happen and it doesn’t."
One of the "doesn't"s wants to be a "does."
2) "including the random forest that began this series), alo provide us the probability of an outcome occurring"
"alo" -> "also"
I proofread a book on AI, and it had some ML in it. Yours is a lot better. TY again.
Thank You for this and previous article on ML, M. Klaus. You're very funny. I don't mean to offend, and dunno this of interest. I found a couple typos:
1) "we predict it to not happen and it doesn’t, we predict it not happen and it doesn’t."
One of the "doesn't"s wants to be a "does."
2) "including the random forest that began this series), alo provide us the probability of an outcome occurring"
"alo" -> "also"
I proofread a book on AI, and it had some ML in it. Yours is a lot better. TY again.
I appreciate it! I always notice some typos too after publishing
Do You want some more on the other two articles? If so, should I post them in comments or is there a better Way?
BTW, looking at China article one-a Your commenters linked to. It's great. (Once again, I can't believe how ig-nrant I am. ;-)
I think email would be the best way: klauskinski at substack dot com
TY. Yes. My day ending, I'll get to it early tomorrow.